GARY KENYON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2014-09-19
No. 1D13-5467
WOLF, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
146 So. 3d 1289 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2014) Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence, and remand for a new trial.

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of trafficking in hydrocodone. A witness at trial was an analyst employed by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement who testified about the nature and quantity of the controlled substance. After this appeal was initiated, this court relinquished jurisdiction to the circuit court to consider appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief which raised a claim of newly discovered evidence: that the FDLE analyst who testified at appellant’s trial had been arrested and charged with multiple counts, including grand theft of a controlled substance, tampering with or fabricating physical evidence related to exhibits submitted to FDLE for testing, and trafficking in illegal substances. The circuit court found the motion for postconviction relief to be well taken and that appellant should be granted a new trial.

REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial.

WOLF, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Snow v. State, 157 So. 3d 559 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
    …[*561] Griffis v. State, 133 So. 3d 653 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); State v. Davis, 141 So. 3d 1230 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Ho Yeaon Seo v. State, 143 So. 3d 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); McCarthy v. State, 145 So. 3d 222 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); and Truitt v. State, 146 So. 3d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). We recognize our sister courts have held to the contrary in Pinder v. State, 128 So. 3d 141 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013); Hartley v. State, 129 So. 3d 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); and Shelley v. State, 134 So. 3d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA), review g…
  • Demarquarius Deonte Truitt v. State, 194 So. 3d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
    …tion of section 847.0135(3), Florida Statutes; traveling to meet a minor, in violation of section 847.0135(4), Florida Statutes; and unlawful use of a two-way communications device, in violation of section 924.215, Florida Statutes. Truitt v. State, 146 So. 3d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). After issuance of that opinion, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that double jeopardy principles prohibit separate convictions based on the same conduct for soliciting and for traveling to engage in unlawful sexual activity with…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw