OSCAR CRAWFORD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2013-09-18
No. 1D12-4930
CLARK, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
147 So. 3d 31 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2013)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without comment Crawford’s conviction and sentence for violation of youthful offender probation. We remand, however, for the sole purpose of having the trial court designate in Crawford’s judgment and sentence whether he maintains his youthful offender status. See Jacques v. State, 95 So.3d 419, 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Mistretta v. State, 99 So.3d 561, 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). Crawford need not be present for the administrative task of correcting the sentence.

CLARK, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw