PNC BANK, N.A., APPELLANT,

v.

JIMMIE P. NEAL, JR., COLLEEN M. NEAL, ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Bartram v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 211 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. 2016)
  …ction with an acceleration of the debt may bar a subsequent foreclosure action based on the same event of default, it does not bar subsequent actions and acceleration based upon different events of default.” Id. Similarly, in PNC Bank, N.A. v. Neal, 147 So. 3d 32, 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), the First District held that an initial foreclosure action that sought acceleration and was dismissed with prejudice did not bar the mortgagee from “instituting a new foreclosure action based on a different act or a new date…
• Deutsche Bank Tr. Co. Americas v. Beauvais, 188 So. 3d 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
  …uent, and separate alleged default create[s] a new default and independent right in the mortgagee to accelerate payment on the note in a subsequent foreclosure action.” Singleton, 882 So. 2d at 1008 (emphasis added); see, e.g., PNC Bank, NA v. Neal, 147 So. 3d 32, 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (stating, that “the dismissal with prejudice of PNC Bank’s foreclosure action .,. does not preclude PNC Bank from instituting a new foreclosure action based on a different act or a new date of default not allegéd in the dismi…
• U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Bartram, 140 So. 3d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)

Authorities Cited

• Singleton v. Greymar Assocs., 882 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 2004)
• Star Funding Solutions, LLC v. Krondes, 101 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
• Laterrance Barnes v. State, 101 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)