LYNDON BAYNE JOHNSON, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Bartram v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 211 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. 2016)
  …ction with an acceleration of the debt may bar a subsequent foreclosure action based on the same event of default, it does not bar subsequent actions and acceleration based upon different events of default.” Id. Similarly, in PNC Bank, N.A. v. Neal, 147 So. 3d 32, 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), the First District held that an initial foreclosure action that sought acceleration and was dismissed with prejudice did not bar the mortgagee from “instituting a new foreclosure action based on a different act or a new date…
• Deutsche Bank Tr. Co. Americas v. Beauvais, 188 So. 3d 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
  …uent, and separate alleged default create[s] a new default and independent right in the mortgagee to accelerate payment on the note in a subsequent foreclosure action.” Singleton, 882 So. 2d at 1008 (emphasis added); see, e.g., PNC Bank, NA v. Neal, 147 So. 3d 32, 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (stating, that “the dismissal with prejudice of PNC Bank’s foreclosure action .,. does not preclude PNC Bank from instituting a new foreclosure action based on a different act or a new date of default not allegéd in the dismi…
• Hicks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 178 So. 3d 957 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)
  …g [*960] that Singleton’s analysis is equally applicable to the statute of limitations issue), review granted, 160 So. 3d 892 (Fla.2014); see also Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Robinson, 168 So. 3d 1279, 1280 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); PNC Bank, N.A. v. Neal, 147 So. 3d 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Star Funding Sols., LLC v. Krondes, 101 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). REVERSED and REMANDED with directions to dismiss the complaint. TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur. . The noto being sued on is dated September 19, 2005, with…