JOSEPH FERREI, PETITIONER,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Joseph Ferrei sought certiorari review of a circuit court order denying his motion for clarification regarding his driver's license suspension. The Florida District Court of Appeal held that when a license suspension period expires during judicial review, the circuit court should quash the administrative order without remanding for further proceedings, as the issue becomes moot.
When a driver's license suspension period expires while a matter is under judicial review, the circuit court should quash the administrative order without remanding for further proceedings, because the issue of the validity of the suspension becomes moot once the suspension period has expired.
[1] When a driver's license suspension period expires during administrative or judicial review, and the Department seeks further formal administrative hearings, the circuit c…
[2] Remanding a moot issue regarding the validity of a driver's license suspension to an administrative tribunal is an error.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Under McLaughlin, 128 So.3d at 815, and Forth, — So.3d-, at *1, we held that when the Department administratively suspends a driver's license, and the suspension period expires while a matter is under review but the department seeks further formal administrative hearings, the circuit court should quash the administrative order, rather than quash and remand for further proceedings.”
States the core holding regarding the proper remedy when a suspension period expires during judicial review
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceFerrei's driver's license was administratively suspended by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. He sought certiorari relief, which wa…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Administrative License Suspension cases and more on FLexlaw
Joseph Ferrei seeks certiorari review of a circuit court order denying his motion for clarification. We have jurisdiction, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B), and grant the petition.
’ In Ferrei v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 91 So.3d 920 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), we quashed a circuit court order that denied Mr. Ferrei certio-rari relief from an administrative decision upholding the suspension of his driver’s license. See §§ 322.2615(1), (6), (14), .31, Fla. Stat. (2008). We directed the circuit court to consider whether an adequate mechanism existed for Mr. Ferrei to challenge the lawfulness of the underlying traffic stop. Ferrei 91 So.3d at 921. The circuit court then reconsidered Mr. Fer-rei’s certiorari petition, quashed the Department’s final order upholding his li*1031cense suspension, and remanded the cause to the Department for further proceedings.
Mr. Ferrei’s license suspension period expired during the review period. In light of our holding in McLaughlin v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 128 So.Bd 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), he moved for clarification of the order in the circuit court. When the circuit court denied his motion, he petitioned this court for second-tier certiorari review to determine whether the circuit court afforded due process and applied the correct law. See Forth v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, — So.3d—, 39 Fla. L. Weekly D1352 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (citations omitted). Under McLaughlin, 128 So.3d at 815, and Forth, — So.3d-, at *1, we held that when the Department administratively suspends a driver’s license, and the suspension period expires while a matter is under review but the department seeks further formal administrative hearings, the circuit court should quash the administrative order, rather than quash and remand for further proceedings. “[N]o further proceedings are necessary on remand because the issue of the validity of the suspension of [the] driver’s license is moot.” McLaughlin, 128 So.3d at 815. The circuit court failed to apply the correct law when it remanded the moot issue to the administrative tribunal. Forth, — So.3d-, at *1.
Petition granted; order quashed insofar as it remanded the case.
ALTENBERND and KELLY, JJ„ Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ferrei v. Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 91 So. 3d 920 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)