ELISHA THOMAS, JR., PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2014-07-22
No. 1D14-0487
THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
148 So. 3d 114 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2014)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The portion of the petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel a ruling on petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). The portion of the petition seeking to compel a ruling on petitioner’s petition for nisi decree is also denied. See Sapp v. Crosby, 917 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (“Because the circuit court has nothing before it on which to rule, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.”).

THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw