ARTHUR STANLEY PETERSON, APPELLANT,

v.

LORRAINE ADELINE PETERSON, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Ellis Dixon, 193 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
  …4, 164 So. 2d 557; and Palmer v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So. 2d 625. And the writ of error coram nobis would be equally unavailing. Grant v. State, Fla.App.1964, 166 So. 2d 503; Russ v. State, Fla.1957, 95 So. 2d 594; Fiske v. State, Fla.App.1958, 107 So. 2d 745; LaRocca v. State, Fla.App.1963, 151 So. 2d 64, and Ard v. State, Fla.1959, 108 So. 2d 42. This brings us to the device finally employed by the trial Court to adjudicate the matter, by motion to quash made before trial. The form of the motion for o…
• Ashley v. State, 433 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …ppropriate vehicle to determine the requisite materiality of Loggie’s testimony in the circumstances of this case. Relief by petition for writ of error coram nobis is discretionary and will not be employed if any other remedy exists. Fiske v. State, 107 So. 2d 745, 747 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968). The purpose of the writ is to correct errors of fact, not errors of law. Hallman v. State, 371 So. 2d 482, 485 (Fla.1979). Coram nobis, however, is not limited to correcting errors of fact solely upon the ground of newly dis…
• Dodd v. Dodd, 114 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)
  …r a property settlement. The defendant’s motion in the instant case simply stated that the plaintiff failed to show a cause of action upon which relief could be granted. This court had a similar case before it in Peterson v. Peterson, Fla.App.1958, 107 So. 2d 745, in which the chancellor below had denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss, and motion to strike. We affirmed the decree in a per curiam decision which referred to the cases of Miller v. Miller, 1938, 134 Fla. 725, 184 So. 672; and Rush v. Rush, 19…

Authorities Cited

• Blanche H. Miller v. Miller, 134 Fla. 725 (Fla. 1938)