HERMAN D. MILLIGAN, APPELLANT,
v.
IRENE WELLS WILSON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A Florida appellate court reversed the dismissal of a complaint based on a Virginia judgment for damages arising from an automobile accident. The court held that a complaint on a foreign judgment need only allege the judgment itself, not the jurisdictional facts supporting it, and that lack of jurisdiction is an affirmative defense to be raised in the answer rather than tested by a motion to dismiss.
A complaint on a foreign judgment need only allege the judgment without setting forth facts showing the foreign court's jurisdiction. Lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter or person is an affirmative defense to be raised in the answer, not tested by a motion to dismiss, unless the plaintiff has affirmatively alleged jurisdictional facts in the complaint.
“In Florida, in a pleading where recovery is sought based on a judgment rendered through the judicial forum of a foreign court, it is sufficient to aver the judgment without setting forth matter showing jurisdiction of that court to render it.”
Establishes the core rule that foreign judgment complaints need only allege the judgment itself, not jurisdictional facts.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMilligan sued in Florida to enforce a $22,500 judgment he had obtained against Wilson in Virginia circuit court for injuries from an automobile accide…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Action On Foreign Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
The action involved is founded on a foreign judgment. The appeal is from an ■order dismissing the complaint.
The complaint is simple in its allegations. Essentially, the averments are that on a certain date, appellant as plaintiff in a certain cause against appellee and another as defendants in the circuit court for the County of Accomac, State of Virginia, recovered judgment in the sum of $22,500 and costs, with interest allowed from the date of the judgment, and that the judgment has not been satisfied. A copy of the judgment is attached to and made a part of the complaint.
The motion to dismiss is that the complaint (1) failed to allege that the appellee-defendant was at the time the cause of action accrued a non-resident of the State of Virginia, and that the record shows the only process issued against her as defendant was as a non-resident- of the State of Virginia and that the appellee-defendant did not appear in the cause; and (2) failed to allege that the employee of the appel-lee-defendant, driver of the automobile at the time of the injuries complained of, was acting within the scope of his alleged employment or agency.
The foreign judgment recovered resulted from an automobile accident in the State of Virginia, and process and the method of its service was based on a Virginia statute, Code 1950, § 8-67.1 et seq. This statute, somewhat similar to ours in Florida, authorizes process and service on non-residents using Virginia roads, this to be accomplished by serving a designated official and by serving defendants by a prescribed method with copies of such process.
Appellee asserts and argues under the grounds of his motion that the Virginia court had jurisdiction neither of the subject matter of the suit nor of the person of the appellee-defendant, and that it was because of this want of jurisdiction that the trial court dismissed the complaint.
An action may be predicated on a foreign judgment under the authority of the full faith and credit clause of the Federal constitution. Irving Trust Co. v. Kaplan, 1944, 155 Fla. 120, 20 So.2d 351; Workingmens Co-operative Bank v. Wallace, 1942, 151 Fla. 329, 9 So.2d 731. Such an action is considered as a new and inde*775pendent action and is not regarded as the same cause as the original action on which the .judgment was recovered. Crane v. Nuta, 1946, 157 Fla. 613, 26 So.2d 670. Where an action is instituted in one state on a judgment recovered in another, the question of the jurisdiction of the court rendering the judgment over the subject matter and over the person sued is open to challenge and adjudication in the latter court. However, the validity of the judgment is generally determined by the law of the state of its rendition. See Gilman v. Morgan, 1947, 158 Fla. 605, 29 So.2d 372, certiorari dismissed 331 U.S. 796, 67 S.Ct. 1740, 91 L.Ed. 1822; First Nat. Bank of Cresson, Pa. v. Brown, 1935, 119 Fla. 761, 162 So. 142; and Irving Trust Co. v. Kaplan, 1944, 155 Fla. 120, 20 So.2d 351.
In Florida, in a pleading where recovery is sought based on a judgment rendered through the judicial forum of a foreign court, it is sufficient to aver the judgment without setting forth matter showing jurisdiction of that court to render it. See 30 F.S.A., Rule 1.9(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Thus we see that when an action is brought on a foreign judgment, it is not required to allege more than the actual judgment. Lack of jurisdiction of the foreign court either over the subject matter or the person is a defense and should be presented and invoked through an answer. There is the qualification, however, if a plaintiff avers in his complaint the jurisdictional facts upon which the foreign judgment was obtained, then the sufficiency of the allegations on this jurisdictional phase may be tested by a motion to dismiss. Pacific Mills v. Hillman Garment, Fla.1956, 87 So.2d 599.
The substance of the complaint has been stated. There was no attempt to allege jurisdictional facts concerning rendition of the foreign judgment. Even a cursory examination of the complaint establishes that its allegations substantially conform to the stated rule of civil procedure. Our view is that the complaint is adequate to withstand the motion to dismiss. The judgment is reversed with direction that the cause proceed in conformity with this opinion.
Reversed.
ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hinchee v. Golden OAK Bank, 540 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)…v. Haas, 59 So. 2d 640 (Fla.1952). The jurisdiction of the foreign court and the validity of the foreign judgment must be analyzed under the law of the foreign state. Trauger v. A.J. Spagnol Lumber Co., 442 So. 2d 182 (Fla.1983); Milligan v. Wilson, 107 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958). The California court did have jurisdiction over the Hinchees. A California court may exercise jurisdiction on any basis which is not inconsistent with the United States Constitution or the California Constitution. Cal.Civ.Proc.C…
-
Wilson v. Milligan, 147 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)…ck County, Virginia. The court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss. Upon appeal, this court held that the complaint was adequate to withstand the motion to dismiss and reversed the judgment for the defendant. Milligan v. Wilson, Fla.App. 1958, 107 So. 2d 773. The specific issue determined there was, that in this action on a foreign judgment, the plaintiff is not required to allege more than the judgment and that questions of lack of jurisdiction should be brought forth in the answer. The defendant answ…
-
In re Est. OF Michael A. O'Keefe v. O'Keefe, 833 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…ates the full faith and credit of the law. Art. IV, § 1, U.S. Const.; 28 U.S.C. § 1738 (2001). Foreign judgments, however, may be challenged on grounds that the foreign court lacked either personal or subject matter jurisdiction. Milligan v. Wilson, 107 So. 2d 773, 775 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958); see also Hinchee v. Golden Oak Bank, 540 So. 2d 262, 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (addressing personal jurisdiction only). “Likewise, the validity of [a foreign] judgment may be challenged on grounds of extrinsic fraud.” Hinchee,…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Pacific Mills v. Hillman Garment, Inc., 87 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 1956)
- Irving Tr. Co. v. Kaplan, 155 Fla. 120 (Fla. 1944)
- Crane v. Nuta, 157 Fla. 613 (Fla. 1946)
- First Nat'l Bank of Cresson v. Brown, 119 Fla. 761 (Fla. 1935)
- Workingmen's Co-Operative Bank v. Wallace, 151 Fla. 329 (Fla. 1942)
- ST. James Realty & Dep't Store Co. v. Whaley, 157 Fla. 613 (Fla. 1946)
- Gilman v. VES H. Morgan and Bessie H. Morgan, 158 Fla. 605 (Fla. 1947)
- North v. Albee, 158 Fla. 605 (Fla. 1947)
- Morgan v. Gilman, 331 U.S. 796 (U.S. 1947)
- Twyeffort, Inc. v. Walling, 331 U.S. 796 (U.S. 1947)