MATTHEW LEE WARREN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2014-10-31
No. 5D14-1238
SAWAYA, LAWSON and BERGER, JJ., concur.
149 So. 3d 738 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Lee Warren appeals the summary denial of all five grounds raised in his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to Grounds Two through Five. However, as the State properly concedes, because the waiver of rights and plea agreement attached to the trial court’s order does not conclusively refute Warren’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress his pre-arrest statements to police, see Zanchez v. State, 84 So.3d 466, 468 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (holding general plea colloquy did not address specific issue of alleged illegal search), we reverse the summary denial of Ground One and remand for attachment of portions of the record refuting that claim or for an evidentiary hearing, see Freeman v. State, 761 So.2d 1055, 1061 (Fla.2000) (“[A] defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction relief motion unless (1) the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, or (2) the motion or a particular claim is legally insufficient.”).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, LAWSON and BERGER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Harris v. State, 204 So. 3d 973 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
    …t-conviction motion). Accordingly, we reverse the summary denial of claim 2 and remand for the post-conviction court to either conduct an evi-dentiary hearing or attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim. See Warren v. State, 149 So. 3d 738, 738 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (reversing summary denial of post-conviction claim where attachments did not conclusively refute claim and remanding for attachments or eviden-tiary hearing). AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED. WALLIS and EDWARD…
  • Ethridge v. State, 173 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)
    …subject him to involuntary civil commitment as a sexually violent predator. We agree, reverse the summary denial, and remand for the trial court to attach portions of the record refuting that claim or for an evidentiary hearing. See Warren v. State, 149 So. 3d 738, 738 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (citing Freeman v. State, 761 So. 2d 1055, 1061 (Fla.2000)). AFFIRMED in PART; REVERSED in PART; REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS. EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw