SANDRA ELLEN COOK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2014-10-31
Nos. 1D13-4674, 1D13-4675
PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
149 So. 3d 1188 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s judgments and sentences. However, upon the state’s proper concession of error, we remand case number 1D13^4674 to the trial court to strike the imposition of $100 for Sheriffs Office Investigative Cost. This cost was neither , requested by the appropriate agency nor specifically orally imposed. See Ogden v. State, 117 So.3d 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Appellant need not be present for the entry of the corrected judgment and sentence.

•AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Saidin v. Jorg Korecki, 202 So. 3d 468 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
    …g injunctive relief under rule 9.130(a)(3)(B) does not extend to afford review of certain other matters the non-final order addresses. Stanberry v. Escambia Cnty., 813 So. 2d 278, 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); see also Hancock v. Suwannee Cnty. Sch. Bd., 149 So. 3d 1188, 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Accordingly, Appellant’s challenges to the non-injunctive portions of the order are dismissed as non-appealable, non-final rulings. See Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 780 So. 2d 834, 863 (Fla.2000) (re…
  • Fla. Fish & Wildlife Conservation Comm'n v. Daws, 256 So. 3d 907 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
    …njunctive relief under rule 9.130(a)(3)(B) does not extend to afford review of certain other matters the non-final order addresses. Stanberry v. Escambia Cnty. , 813 So. 2d 278, 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) ; see also Hancock v. Suwannee Cnty. Sch. Bd. , 149 So. 3d 1188, 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Accordingly, Appellant's challenges to the non-injunctive portions of the order are dismissed as non-appealable, non-final rulings. See Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure , 780 So. 2d 834, 863 (Fla.2000) (r…
  • Aaoep USA, Inc. v. PEX German OE Parts, LLC, 202 So. 3d 470 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
    …ctive [*472] relief under rule 9.130(a)(3)(B) does not extend to afford review of certain other matters the non-final order addresses. Stanberry v. Escambia Cnty., 813 So. 2d 278, 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); see also Hancock v. Suwannee Cnty. Sch. Bd., 149 So. 3d 1188, 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Accordingly, Appellant’s challenges to the non-injunctive portions of the order are dismissed as non-appealable, non-final rulings. See Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 780 So. 2d 834, 863 (Fla.2000) (re…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw