EDWARD MARCUS MILLS, III, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2014-10-29
No. 2D13-1859
NORTHCUTT and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
150 So. 3d 272 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the revocation of supervision orders but remanded for correction of the written orders.


Facts & Procedural History

The trial court revoked Edward Marcus Mills III's orders of supervision based on his admission to violating condition five (use and possession of mari…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
ALTENBERND, Judge.

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Edward Marcus Mills, III, appeals a single order revoking his orders of supervision in six separate cases.1 As a result of the revocations of supervision, Mr. Mills is now serving a large number of concurrent terms of imprisonment, the longest of which is eight years. We affirm the revocation but remand for the entry of corrected revocation orders.

During the revocation hearing, the trial court relied exclusively on Mr. Mills’ admission that he had violated condition five of the standard conditions of supervision for each of his orders of supervision. This admission involved Mr. Mills’ use and possession of marijuana at a time when he was subject to these supervisory orders. As correctly argued by Mr. Mills, the written order of revocation erroneously lists violations of conditions “9,16, [and] Special Condition 2,” even though he admitted violating only condition five. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Mr. Mills’ orders of supervision, but we remand for the trial court to enter corrected revocation orders that include only a violation of condition five as the basis for the revocation.2

Affirmed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw