ANTHONY WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the defendant was entitled to an additional day of jail credit because the calculation of time spent in jail from arrest to release was incorrect.
The defendant was arrested, bonded out, and later arrested on a warrant before being sentenced. He was awarded 125 days of jail credit, but argued he …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.801 cases and more on FLexlaw
Anthony Williams appeals the order summarily denying his motion to correct jail credit filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. We reverse.
Williams was arrested on May 27, 2011, and later charged with criminal mischief, burglary of a structure, possession of burglary tools, and grand theft. On June 1, 2011, he bonded out of jail. After Williams failed to appear, a warrant for his arrest was issued, and it was served on March 15, 2013. Williams pleaded to the offenses and was sentenced on July 12, 2013. He was awarded 125 days of jail credit, 5 days for the time he spent in jail after his original arrest and 120 days for the time he spent in jail after he was arrested for failing to appear.
In his motion to correct jail credit, Williams argued that under these facts he was entitled to one more day of jail credit for a total of 126 days. The State asserted that Williams was entitled to only four days’ credit for the time he spent in jail from May 27, 2011, to June 1, 2011, and that he should have been awarded a total of 124 days’ credit. The postconviction *1213court concurred with the State’s calculations and denied Williams’ motion. But May 27 to June 1 is 6 days. See Bronk v. State, 25 So.3d 701, 703 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (noting that the statutory entitlement to jail credit starts with the initial arrest and continues until the actual release from custody). Thus, Williams is entitled to one more day of jail credit. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the postconviction court to award Williams one more day of jail credit for a total of 126 days. Reversed and remanded with directions.
MORRIS and SLEET, JJ., Concur.