HOLLY D. MORGAN AND DANIEL E. SPRINGEN, PETITIONERS,
v.
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT HEWITT, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILBUR HEWITT, RESPONDENT

Fla. 5th DCA | 2014-11-21
No. 5D14-1362
LAWSON, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
150 So. 3d 1273 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The circuit court's dismissal of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, based on the belief that a plenary appeal would provide an adequate remedy, was a departure from established law and a miscarriage of justice.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioners claimed ownership interest in property they resided on and appealed a non-final order granting immediate possession to the Respondent. The…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners, Holly D. Morgan and Daniel E. Springen, seek second-tier certiorari review of an appellate decision of the circuit court, which dismissed their appeal1 of a non-final order granting immediate possession of real property in favor of the Respondent, Christopher Scott Hewitt, as personal representative of the estate of Wilbur Hewitt.2 Petitioners have resided on the property for the past five years and claim to have an ownership interest in the property. Under these circumstances, we find the circuit court’s clearly erroneous conclusion — that it lacked jurisdiction on the basis that a plenary appeal would provide an adequate remedy for Petitioners— constituted a departure from established law resulting in a miscarriage of justice. See generally Custer Med. Ctr. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 62 So.3d 1086 (Fla.2010). Accordingly, we grant the petition and remand to the circuit court to treat Petitioners’ request for review as a petition for writ of certiorari and consider its merits.

PETITION GRANTED.

LAWSON, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw