WAYMON BISHOP, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court's order should be clarified to strike erroneous language identifying the defendant as a sexual predator.
The defendant appealed an order denying his motion to clarify his sentences. The order at issue stated he was found to be a sexual predator. The State…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sexual Predator Designation cases and more on FLexlaw
Waymon Bishop appeals the trial court’s November 18, 2013 order denying his motion to clarify his sentences in lower tribunal case number 90-14763-A.1 This court has considered Bishop’s motion as filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).
The order on review states, in pertinent part, “[I]n 2001, pursuant to the Jimmy Ryce act [sic] the defendant was found to *1277be a sexual predator” in lower tribunal case number 01-10787.
The State concedes that it dismissed its petition to have Bishop declared a sexual predator under the Jimmy Ryce Act in lower tribunal case number 01-10787.2
Accordingly, we remand for the limited purpose of striking the sexual predator language from the trial court’s November 18, 2018 order.3
Remanded with directions.