JODY MICHAEL KIRKLAND, FORMER HUSBAND, APPELLANT,
v.
LAURIE JEAN KIRKLAND, FORMER WIFE, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2014-11-24
No. 1D14-4917
LEWIS, C. J., THOMAS and OSTERHAUS, JJ, concur.
153 So. 3d 942 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has sought review of the lower tribunal’s August 19, 2014, Order Denying Former Husband’s Supplemental Petition to Modify Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of October 29, 2014, the Court has determined that the order is a non-final order as it reserves jurisdiction and contemplates the exercise of additional judicial labor with regard to the issue of child support. Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Klein v. Klein, 551 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

LEWIS, C. J., THOMAS and OSTERHAUS, JJ, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cisneros v. Guinand (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
    …s is so often the case in custody proceedings, regardless of the nomenclature employed by the parties, the stipulated judgment clearly anticipates the expenditure of further judicial labor, rendering it nonfinal. See, e.g., Kirkland v. Kirkland, 153 So. 3d 942 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Fowler v. Fowler, 166 So. 3d 188 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Freiha v. Freiha, 169 So. 3d 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). This is evidenced through 6 both a conflict resolution provision, expressly permitting the parties to submit a…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw