MARIO CHALMERS, APPELLANT,
v.
BRITTANY BURROUGH, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the supplemental final judgment in most respects but reversed and remanded for clarification on parental responsibility.
Appellant appealed a supplemental final judgment modifying child support and parental responsibility. The trial court's judgment was challenged regard…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ultimate Decision-Making Authority cases and more on FLexlaw
Appellant, Mario Chalmers appeals the trial court’s supplemental final judgment which modified child support and parental responsibility as to the parties’ minor child, Q.E.C.
*537We affirm the supplemental final judgment in all respects, with one exception. We reverse and remand for the trial court to clarify whether the supplemental final judgment maintained the parents’ shared parental responsibility (with Appellee given ultimate decision-making on medical, health and educational issues1, or whether the supplemental final judgment modified the final judgment by awarding Appellee sole parental responsibility, requiring a determination that maintaining shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child. See § 61.13(2)(c)2., Fla. Stat. (2012); Hunter v. Hunter, 540 So.2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).2
We therefore reverse in part the supplemental final judgment and remand for further proceedings as may be necessary on this limited issue, and for entry of an amended supplemental final judgment. In all other respects, the supplemental final judgment is affirmed.