LENORRIS MINCEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2015-02-06
No. 5D14-1528
SAWAYA, PALMER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
158 So. 3d 697 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2015) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the defendant's notice of appeal was untimely, requiring dismissal of the appeal.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant's motion for rehearing was deemed denied by operation of law after the trial court failed to rule within 40 days. The defendant then fil…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Lenorris Mincey, defendant, appeals the trial court’s order denying all claims raised in his original and amended motions for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We dismiss this appeal as untimely.

Pursuant to rule 3.850(j), a trial court’s order disposing of a motion for rehearing shall be filed no later than 40 days from the date of the order of which rehearing is sought. If no order is issued within 40 days, the motion is deemed denied.

In this case, the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s post-conviction motion was rendered on October 22, 2013, and his motion for a rehearing was filed timely on November 6, 2013. Thus, the trial court was required to issue an order on the motion for rehearing on or before December 2, 2013, or else the motion for rehearing would be deemed denied on that date. Here, the trial court failed to timely render an order addressing the motion for rehearing on or before December 2nd. Therefore, the defendant’s appellate window began on that date. Thus, the defendant had 30 days from December 2nd to file a timely notice of appeal. His notice *698was not filed until April 24, 2014. Accordingly, we dismiss this untimely appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …im. Pro., 26 So. 3d 534 (Fla.2009). According to the report, this puts the rendition of postconviction orders in question, and could result in the delayed filing of a notice of appeal and dismissal by the appellate court. See, e.g., Mincey v. State, 158 So. 3d 697 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (dismissing an appeal as untimely because the appellant failed to file a notice of appeal of an order denying rule 3.850 motions within 30 days from the date the court failed to issue an order on the appellant’s motion for rehear…
  • Paul v. State, 268 So. 3d 754 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw