GEORGE M. EVANS, APPELLANT,
v.
DEIDRE MURPHY, APPELLEE
GEORGE M. EVANS, APPELLANT,
DEIDRE MURPHY, APPELLEE
159 So. 3d 199
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2015)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Murphy v. Murphy, 96 So.3d 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Rokicki v. Rolcicki, 660 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); *200 Newell v. Newell, 464 So.2d 222 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Evans v. Murphy, 272 So. 3d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)…an attempt to re-litigate issues which were previously known and could have been addressed at the time the original order was entered.” We agree, and further conclude that the amended motion was barred by law of the case. See Evans v. Murphy, 159 So. 3d 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Suffolk Constr. Co. v. First Sealord Sur., Inc., 63 So. 3d 18, 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“When an appellate court has decided a question of law, the decision of the court becomes 1 We not…
Authorities Cited
- Newell v. Newell, 464 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Deirdre A. Murphy v. Evans, 96 So. 3d 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
- Mansueto v. State, 660 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
- Rokicki v. Ewa Rokicki, 660 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)