TERRY D. BRIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2015-03-12
No. 1D14-5303
CLARK and ROWE, JJ., concur.
159 So. 3d 366 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2015)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The appellate court held that the Santa Rosa County circuit court had proper jurisdiction to review the petition for writ of habeas corpus.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in Santa Rosa County, where he was incarcerated. The trial court transferred the petition to Esca…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, J.

ROBERTS, J.

The Appellant, Terry D. Bright, appeals the decision of the First Judicial Circuit Court in Santa Rosa County to transfer his petition for writ of habeas corpus to the First Judicial Circuit Court in Escambia County. We agree that the Santa Rosa County Court had the proper jurisdiction to review the petition.

The trial court transferred the petition in this case after finding that the Appellant was attacking the legality of his original classification as a habitual felony offender. See Coakley v. State, 43 So.3d 790 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (finding that the trial court that imposed the sentence has jurisdiction when an appellant attempts to attack his conviction by raising issues relating to the trial or the propriety of a plea). However, as conceded by the Appellee, the trial court’s interpretation of the petition was incorrect.

Section 79.09, Florida Statutes (2014), provides that petitions for writ of habeas corpus must be filed with the clerk of the circuit court of the county in which the prisoner is detained. Here, the Appellant was incarcerated in Santa Rosa County at the time of filing and has since been transferred to a work camp in Escambia County. Because the Appellant was incarcerated in Santa Rosa County at the time of filing, the Santa Rosa County circuit court has jurisdiction over the petition. Accordingly, we REVERSE the transfer of the petition.

CLARK and ROWE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw