JOHNIE RAVON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2015-03-11
No. 3D14-2078
Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and EMAS and SCALES, JJ.
159 So. 3d 945 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2015) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Washington v. Recueno, 548 U.S. 212 (2006) (holding claims of error under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), are subject to harmless error analysis); Galindez v. State, 955 So.2d 517 (Fla.2007) (acknowledging Recueno and holding harmless error analysis can properly be applied to claim that sentence was illegal for failure to submit to jury those factual findings which were necessary for reclassification or enhancement of sentence).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw