DAVID BRASHER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2015-03-18
Nos. 4D14-3031, 4D14-4137
WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ, concur.
160 So. 3d 107 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2015)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a sworn and legally sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. See Mathis v. State, 139 So.3d 988 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). Thereafter, appellant can revisit the legality of his sentence. See, e.g., McLeod v. State, 58 So.3d 931 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Lawson v. State, 46 So.3d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw