DANIEL STAHL, APPELLANT,
v.
HIALEAH HOSPITAL AND SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Workers' Compensation Exclusive Remedy cases and more on FLexlaw
OPINION ON MOTION FOR WRITTEN OPINION
This cause is before us on Appellant’s motion for Written Opinion. We grant the motion and, accordingly, withdraw our former opinion of February 3, 2015, and substitute this opinion in its place.
In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant asserts that the 1994 addition of a $10 copay for medical visits after a claimant attains maximum medical improvement, and the 2003 elimination of permanent partial disability (PPD) benefits, make the Workers’ Compensation Law an inadequate exclusive replacement remedy for a tort action. See Ch. 93-415, § 17, at 110, Laws of Fla. (substantially rewriting section 440.13, Florida Statutes); Ch. 03-412, § 18, at 3920-24, Laws of Fla. *520(amending section 440.15(3)(c), Florida Statutes). We disagree, because both amendments withstand rational basis review, in that the copay provision furthers the legitimate stated purpose of ensuring reasonable medical costs after the injured worker has reached a maximum state of medical improvement, and PPD benefits were supplanted by impairment income benefits. See, e.g., § 440.015, Fla. Stat. (“It is the intent of the Legislature that the Workers’ Compensation Law be interpreted so as to assure the quick and efficient delivery of disability and medical benefits to an injured worker and to facilitate the worker’s return to gainful reemployment-at a reasonable cost to the employer.”); Bradley v. Hurricane Rest., 670 So.2d 162, 165 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (“Physical impairment is one accepted criterion for measuring benefits, and it was within the legislature’s discretion to utilize this standard.”).
AFFIRMED.
THOMAS, CLARK, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Beck v. MMI Dining Systems/Montverde Academy/Travelers Ins. Co., 183 So. 3d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…atutory provision, his position would not prevail because this court has previously held that the 2003 elimination of permanent partial disability benefits in favor of impairment benefits withstands rational basis review. See Stahl v. Hialeah Hosp., 160 So. 3d 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), review granted, 2015 WL 6126944 (Fla. Oct. 13, 2015). AFFIRMED. ROWE and SWANSON, JJ., concur.…
-
Stahl v. Hialeah Hosp., 191 So. 3d 883 (Fla. 2016)…PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida Constitution, to review the decision in Stahl v. Hialeah Hospital, 160 So. 3d 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), in which the First District Court of Appeal declared certain provisions of chapter 440, Florida Statutes, to be valid. After further consideration and hearing oral argument in this case, we have determined that we should exercis…
Authorities Cited
- Bradley v. The Hurricane Rest. & Associated Indus. of Fla. Prop. & Cas. Tr., 670 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)