CHARLES JOHNSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
CHARLES JOHNSON, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
160 So. 3d 921
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2015)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).
LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Taylor v. Taylor, 183 So. 3d 1121 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)…facially clear but an extrinsic fact or extraneous circumstance creates a need for interpretation or reveals an insufficiency in the contract or a failure to specify the rights or duties of the parties in certain situations. See Whiting v. Whiting, 160 So. 3d 921, 924 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); McClune v. McClune, 79 So. 3d 194, 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012); GE Fanuc Intelligent Platforms [*1123] Embedded v. Brijot Imaging Sys., Inc., 51 So. 3d 1243, 1245 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). “When a contract contains a latent .ambigui…
-
Saadeh v. Connors, 166 So. 3d 959 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)…ncur. . "Once formed, plenary guardianships grant all of the ward's delegable rights over person and property to the guardian, while limited guardianships grant only that authority expressly set forth in the guardianship order.” Whiting v. Whiting, 160 So. 3d 921, 925 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); see also § 744.344(5), Fla. Stat. (2009) ("A plenary guardian shall exercise all delegable rights and powers of the incapacitated person.”). . The statute provides in pertinent part: Recognizing that every individual has…
Authorities Cited
- Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004)