ADONICA SPADA, APPELLANT,
v.
AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 5th DCA | 2015-04-17
No. 5D14-3607
LAWSON, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
160 So. 3d 960 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2015) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912, 916 (Fla.1957) (recognizing that appellate courts “will not undertake to re-weigh ... the evidence presented before the tribunal or agency whose order is under examination .... [but] merely examine[ ]■ the record made below to determine whether the lower tribunal had before it competent substantial evidence to support its findings”).

LAWSON, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rowell v. State, 183 So. 3d 1249 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
    …PER CURIAM. In Rowell v. State, 160 So. 3d 960 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015), we remanded this cause with instructions to address that aspect of the sentencing order that revoked Appellant’s Youthful Offender “status.” We affirmed the duration of the sentence. On remand, the trial court ordered the State…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw