ZAWALSKI EDWARDS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2014-02-26
No. 4D13-2148
DAMOORGIAN, C.J., CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur^
162 So. 3d 3 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2014) Negative Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant filing a rule 3.800(a) motion that demonstrates on the face of the record that juvenile convictions were used as predicate offenses to support his sentencing enhancements. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045, 1051 (Fla.2011); Martinez v. State, 976 So.2d 68 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); see also Gonzalez v. State, 132 So.3d 296 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur^


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Donarius Javorius Johnson v. State, 204 So. 3d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
    …ant, the trial court, pursuant to our holding in Norvil v. State, heard evidence on, and considered Appellant’s two pending charges, both of which resulted from incidents that took place after Appellant committed the underlying offense in this casé. 162 So. 3d 3, 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (holding “that a sentencing court may properly consider subsequent arrests and related charges, if relevant, in determining an appropriate sentence”), quashed by 191 So. 3d 406 (Fla.2016). During the pendency of this appeal,…
    1 / 2
  • Strong v. State, 254 So. 3d 428 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
  • Bidier Colas Costa v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw