FETTERMAN AND ASSOCIATES, P.A., APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT FRIEDRICH AND HEATHER FRIEDRICH, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 2014-05-21
No. 4D09-3661
MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
162 So. 3d 33 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
DAMOORGIAN, C.J.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

DAMOORGIAN, C.J.

We reconsider on remand our opinion in Fetterman & Associates, P.A. v. Friedrich, 69 So.3d 965 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), which was quashed by the Florida Supreme Court following its decision in Friedrich v. Fetterman & Associates, P.A., 137 So.3d 362 (Fla.2013). As ordered by the supreme court, we remand and direct the trial court to reinstate its original final judgment.

Reversed and Remanded.

MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Gotowala v. State, 184 So. 3d 568 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
    …LEVINE, J. In Gotowala v. State, 162 So. 3d 33 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014), we reversed because the lower court summarily denied Gotowala’s petition to seal his criminal records. We instructed the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing or provide written reasons as to why it was denying the petit…
  • Cole Borg v. State, 169 So. 3d 261 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
    …reverse the order denying appellant’s [*262] petition to seal records and remand to the trial court for a new hearing prior to July-25, 20151 on appellant’s motion filed pursuant to section 943.059(1), Florida Statutes (2014). See Gotowala v. State, 162 So. 3d 33, 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). The trial court’s order denying sealing of records did not consider the facts and circumstances of the individual case and denied relief based upon generalized considerations, which is not a proper exercise of its discretion…
  • Simone Maxwell v. State, 185 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
    …l history record, and any request for expunction of a criminal history record may be denied at the sole discretion of the court.” § 943.0585, Fla. Stat. (2014). However, the court’s discretion to deny a petition is not unlimited. Gotowala v. State, 162 So. 3d 33, 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). Where a petition substantially complies with all of the -section 943.0585 requirements, the petitioner is presumptively entitled to an order of expunction “absent a finding by the trial judge that there was ‘a good reason fo…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw