VICTOR MOSKALENKO, PETITIONER,
v.
SCOTT ISRAEL, SHERIFF OF BROWARD COUNTY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a civil contempt order requiring incarceration must include a finding that the contemnor has the present ability to purge the contempt.
Petitioner sought habeas corpus relief from incarceration for civil contempt. The contempt order required petitioner to pay proceeds from a property s…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ability To Purge Contempt cases and more on FLexlaw
We grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in this case without prejudice to the trial court issuing an order that complies with Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985). “[I]ncarceration cannot be imposed upon a civil con-temnor for willfully failing to comply with a court order unless the court first determines that the contemnor has the present ability to purge himself of contempt.” Id. at 1278.
Even if a contemnor’s own actions caused him to lack the ability to pay, he may not be incarcerated indefinitely for civil contempt if he lacks the ability to pay the purge. Elliott v. Bradshaw, 59 So.3d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). In this case, the written contempt order provides that the petitioner may purge by tendering to the personal representative of his deceased wife’s estate the total net proceeds from the sale of the real property in question, with satisfactory documentation that the amount accurately reflects the net proceeds. However, the order does not contain a finding that the petitioner has the present ability to comply with the purge provisions.
Accordingly, petitioner shall be released from custody unless the trial court enters an order that complies with Bowen by 5:00 p.m. on the third business day following the date of issuance of this opinion. This decision does not preclude further civil contempt proceedings or criminal contempt proceedings if appropriate. See Elliott, 59 So.3d at 1184. We will entertain no motions for rehearing and the clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.
Petition Granted.
STEVENSON, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Eugenia Bowen & the Fla. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1985)
- Elliott v. Palm Beach Cnty. Sheriff Ric Bradshaw, 59 So. 3d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)