EHREN WITT, PETITIONER,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 3d DCA | 2015-04-08
No. 3D14-2146
Before LAGOA, EMAS, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
162 So. 3d 1049 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2015) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court denied the petition for a belated appeal on the merits.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner sought a belated appeal, claiming his counsel failed to include the judgment of convictions in the notice of appeal. The court reviewed the…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The Petitioner, Ehren Witt (“Witt”), seeks a belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). We deny the petition on the merits.

Witt asserts that his appellate counsel filed a Notice of Appeal from the September 5, 2008 sentencing order, but that counsel did not include the judgment of convictions in the Notice of Appeal. Witt, therefore, seeks a belated appeal from the judgment of convictions.

A review of the Notice of Appeal filed by Witt’s appellate counsel in October 2008 refutes Witt’s assertion as the notice seeks review of both the convictions and sentences. Additionally, a review of the initial brief filed by Witt’s appellate counsel before this Court also conclusively refutes Witt’s assertion. Specifically, Witt’s appellate counsel sought reversal of “Witt’s judgment of conviction and sentence” and requested that this Court “remand [the] cause to the trial court for a new trial.”

Accordingly, we deny the petition on the merits.

Petition denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Adbelaziz Hamze v. Hall, 211 So. 3d 47 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
    …Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c), it is not an interlocutory order that may be independently appealed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3) (listing non-final orders that are appealable to the District Courts of Appeal); see also Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass’n v. Murphy, 162 So. 3d 1049, 1050 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (holding that an order granting summary judgment on liability where damages remained in dispute was not a final, appealable order). Furthermore, an order denying a motion to set aside a default judgment is not reviewable unt…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw