LEONARDO URGUELLES, APPELLANT,
v.
EL OASIS CAFE AND TECHNOLOGY INS. CO., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court reversed a JCC's reduction of a stipulated attorney's fee in workers' compensation, holding that each separate attorney's fee is independently subject to the 20/15/10 statutory formula, not cumulatively applied across multiple fee agreements.
Each separate and distinct attorney's fee in workers' compensation is independently subject to the 20/15/10 statutory formula under section 440.34(1), Florida Statutes.
[1] Each separate and distinct attorney's fee in workers' compensation is independently subject to the statutory 20/15/10 fee formula under section 440.34(1), Florida Statute…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“each separate and distinct attorney's fee is subject to the 20/15/10 formula”
Court's holding regarding the proper application of the statutory fee schedule to multiple attorney fee agreements in workers' compensation cases
Claimant sought approval of a stipulated attorney's fee in a workers' compensation case. The JCC had previously approved another attorney's fee on a l…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attorney'S Fees In Workers' Compensation cases and more on FLexlaw
In this workers’ compensation appeal, Claimant argues that the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) erred when he reduced a stipulated Claimant-paid attorney’s fee submitted for his approval to ten percent of the monetary value of past benefits secured. Section 440.34(1), Florida Statutes (2012), provides that “any attorney’s fee” approved by a JCC must equal 20% of the first $5,000 secured by the attorney, 15% of the next $5,000, and 10% of the remaining benefits secured over $10,000 (the “20/15/10 formula”). The JCC indicated that he reduced the stipulated fee amount under the 20/15/10 formula based on his interpretation that the first $10,000 in benefits secured, to which the percentages of twenty and fifteen percent would apply, had been “exhausted” with the approval of another attorney’s fee on a lump-sum settlement (which were collected by another attorney altogether). The JCC did not, however, have the benefit of our recent decision in Cortes-Martinez v. Pal *1058 metto Vegetable Co., 159 So.3d 934 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), where this Court held that each separate and distinct attorney’s fee is subject to the 20/15/10 formula. Because the reduction here was based on an incorrect interpretation of the application of the 20/15/10 formula, we REVERSE and REMAND for entry of an order approving the stipulated Claimant-paid attorney’s fee.
WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Jovita Cortes-Martinez v. Palmetto Vegetable Co., LLC, 159 So. 3d 934 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)