DERRICK CULVER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An attorney can waive the preparation of a presentence investigation report, and this waiver is binding on the defendant.
[1] A defendant's right to a presentence investigation report may be waived by counsel.
[2] A waiver of a presentence investigation report is not rendered invalid by the fact that it is not personally made by the defendant.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant agreed to an open plea hoping for youthful offender sentencing but his attorney waived the presentence investigation report to meet the age …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Youthful Offender Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
Rather than continue with his trial, appellant agreed to an open plea to the court one day before his twenty-first birthday, in the hope that the court would sentence appellant as a youthful offender for his-crimes. In doing so, his counsel waived the preparation of a presentence investigation report, because to obtain one would push sentencing past his birthday and thus eliminate the court’s ability to impose a youthful offender sentence. After the court rejected a youthful offender sentence and sentenced him to a substantial prison sentence, appellant moved to vacate his plea, claiming he was entitled to a presen-tence investigation before the court could *623sentence him. The court denied the motion.
We affirm. Although appellant contends that his right to a presentence investigation could not be waived by his attorney, we rejected this same argument in Ortiz v. State, 9 So.3d 774, 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), where we held that the preparation of the presentence investigation in a habitual offender case was a procedural right which did not require a defendant’s personal waiver. The same analysis applies to waiver of the presentence investigation required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.710. While Albarracin v. State, 112 So.3d 574 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), relied on by appellant, does state that a presentence investigation is required for youthful offender sentencing, that case did not involve a waiver by defense attorney.
Had the presentence investigation not been waived, its preparation, which usually takes sixty days, would have prevented the court from imposing a youthful offender sentence, as appellant would have passed his twenty-first birthday. Moreover, appellant did present evidence to the court of his background and character, so the court was able to weigh the absence of prior criminal history against the nature of the crimes committed. In doing so, the court clearly concluded, on the record, that because of the nature of the crimes, youthful offender sentencing was not appropriate.
Affirmed.
WARNER, GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Van Hatcher v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
Authorities Cited
- Albarracin v. State, 112 So. 3d 574 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
- Ortiz v. State, 9 So. 3d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)