BRENTON MCNEIL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BRENTON MCNEIL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
163 So. 3d 661
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2015)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION
Following the issuance of our opinion in this case, Appellant, Brenton McNeil, moved for certification of a question of *662great public importance. We grant the motion and certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v) as one of great public importance:
ARE THE COSTS IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 938.085, 938.08, AND 938.10, FLORIDA STATUTES (2006), ASSESSED “PER CASE” OR “PER COUNT”?
QUESTION CERTIFIED.
SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brenton McNeil v. State, 215 So. 3d 55 (Fla. 2017)…tion to certify the question, certified the following question as one of great public importance: ARE THE COSTS IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 938.085, 938.08, AND 938.10, FLORIDA STATUTES (2006), ASSESSED “PER CASE” OR “PER COUNT”? McNeil v. State, 163 So. 3d 661 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, we answer the certified question by holding that sections 938.08, 938.085, and 938.10(1), Florida Statutes (2006), call for imposition of cost…
-
Dixon v. State, 182 So. 3d 670 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)…ified the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as a matter of great public importance: ARE THE COSTS IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 938.085, 938.08, AND 938.10, FLORIDA STATUTES (2006), ASSESSED “PER CASE” OR “PER COUNT”? McNeil v. State, 163 So. 3d 661, 661 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). The Florida Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction to review this court’s decision in McNeil. We again certify as a matter of great public importance the same question, but only as to section 938.10. We note that the impositi…