ARTHUR DEBOSE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2015-04-29
No. 3D13-2119
Before ROTHENBERG, EMAS, and SCALES, JJ.
163 So. 3d 715 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2015) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
ROTHENBERG, J.

ROTHENBERG, J.

The defendant, Arthur Debose, appeals his convictions for second degree murder with a firearm and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. The sole issue the defendant raises on appeal is that he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. As the claimed ineffectiveness is not apparent on the face of the record, we affirm without prejudice to the defendant to file a timely postcon-viction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Kidd v. State, 978 So.2d 868, 868-69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Desire v. State, 928 So.2d 1256, 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Debose v. State, 237 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
    …f a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. On direct appeal, this Court affirmed Debose's convictions and sentences without prejudice to Debose raising ineffective assistance of trial counsel in a timely rule 3.850 motion. See Debose v. State, 163 So. 3d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). On September 6, 2016, Debose filed the instant rule 3.850 motion, later amended, raising therein what amounts to ten separate claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. After ordering a response from the State, the trial…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw