STEPHEN TRESSEL, APPELLANT,
v.
LUCIA GATTA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the denial of a contempt motion for unpaid temporary attorney's fees where the former wife presented credible evidence of inability to pay the full purge amount, satisfying her burden to overcome the presumption of ability to pay.
A former wife may overcome the presumption of ability to pay temporary attorney's fees by presenting credible evidence of her inability to pay the purge amount, even if the trial court's initial statements appeared to place the burden on the husband.
[1] A party seeking to enforce payment of temporary attorney's fees through contempt must establish the obligor's ability to pay; credible evidence of inability to pay the fu…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the wife satisfied her burden of overcoming the presumption of ability to pay”
The court explained that the wife's evidence of inability to pay the purge amount satisfied her burden under the applicable standard.
A former husband moved for contempt against his former wife for failure to pay an award of temporary attorney's fees. The wife presented evidence of h…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Presumption Of Ability To Pay cases and more on FLexlaw
We affirm the order denying the former husband’s motion for contempt against the former wife for failure to pay his award of temporary attorney’s fees. Although the trial court at one point in the proceedings erroneously appeared to place the burden of proving an ability to pay on the husband, the husband did not object to the court’s statements. We also interpret those statements, not as requiring the husband to prove ability to pay but to identify a source from which the wife could pay a contempt order. Moreover, the wife presented evidence of her inability to pay the purge amount, which was the entire amount of the temporary award, and this evidence was accepted and relied on by the trial court in denying the motion for contempt. Thus, based upon the court’s findings and determinations of credibility, the wife satisfied her burden of overcoming the presumption of ability to pay. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274, 1278-79 (Fla.1985); see also Perez v. Perez, 599 So.2d 682, 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). The fact that the court did not find the evidence sufficient to warrant contempt, however, does not preclude other relief. Our affirmance, therefore, is without prejudice to the husband securing a judgment in his favor for the unpaid temporary award in the final judgment of dissolution, or alternatively, by the filing of an amended motion for contempt requesting a purge amount within the wife’s present ability to pay.
Affirmed.
WARNER, GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Eugenia Bowen & the Fla. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1985)
- Perez v. Perez, 599 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)