GENO LEWIS HAWKINS SR., PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2015-05-27
No. 1D15-2012
BENTON, CLARK, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
164 So. 3d 772 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2015) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. See Francois v. Wainwright, 470 So.2d 685 (Fla.1985) (stating that a successive petition for writ of habeas corpus may be summarily denied).

Petitioner is warned that any future filings which the court determines to be successive or frivolous may result in a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.

BENTON, CLARK, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Geno Lewis Hawkins Sr. v. State, 176 So. 3d 1283 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
    …ion; the four prior petitions have all been dismissed. See Hawkins v. State, 151 So. 3d 494 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Hawkins v. State, 2015 WL 770253 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); 2037501458 Hawkins v. State, 164 So. 3d 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Hawkins v. State, 164 So. 3d 772 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). In the two most recent opinions dismissing Hawkins’ petitions, he was warned that any future successive or frivolous filings could result in sanctions, including a referral to the Florida Department of Corrections for disciplina…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw