THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
JOSHUA ISAAC ROTH, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The State of Florida appealed the dismissal of a conspiracy to traffic in oxycodone charge against Joshua Isaac Roth. The trial court had dismissed the charge as legally insufficient because it used 'and/or' to describe the conspiracy's object (sale, purchase, delivery, or possession), which the court found was impermissibly vague. The appellate court reversed, holding that the charge adequately alleged a single conspiracy object (trafficking in oxycodone) and that the statutory offense may be committed through multiple alternative acts or means.
The conspiracy charge was legally sufficient. While the charge may describe multiple acts or means through which the conspiracy could be committed, it clearly alleges a single conspiracy object: trafficking in oxycodone. The use of 'and/or' to describe alternative acts or means of committing the offense is permissible under Florida law because the statutory offense of trafficking can be committed through multiple alternative acts.
[1] A criminal information is legally sufficient if it alleges the object of the conspiracy and includes the pertinent statutory provisions.
[2] Allegations of the manner or means by which a trafficking offense was to be committed are unnecessary to the adequacy of a conspiracy charge.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the allegations of the manner or means by which [a] trafficking offense was to be committed are unnecessary to the adequacy of the conspiracy charge.”
Establishes that charging alternative means of committing trafficking does not render a conspiracy charge legally deficient.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBetween March 7, 2013 and April 6, 2013, a second amended information charged Roth and co-defendant Alberto Vizcaino Gonzalez with conspiracy to traff…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sufficiency Of Criminal Information cases and more on FLexlaw
The State of Florida appeals a circuit court order dismissing without prejudice a second amended information charging the appellee and a co-defendant with conspiracy to traffic in illegal drugs (oxycodone), 28 grams or more. We reverse.
The issue is whether the count including the appellee was legally sufficient under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.140(d)(1). The second amended information charged that:
between on or about March 7, 2013, and on or about April 6, 2013, in the Eleventh and Sixteenth Judicial Circuits of Florida, to-wit: Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties, Defendants, ALBERTO VIZCAINO GONZALEZ and JOSHUA ISAAC ROTH, did knowingly and unlawfully agree, conspire, combine, or confederate with each other, IHOBEL PEREZ, YOSBEL FLORES-RODRIGUEZ, JULIO ABREU, and others unknown to sell, purchase, deliver and/or actually or constructively possess 28 grams or more of oxycodone, or any salt, derivative, isomer, or salt of an isomer thereof, as described in s. 893.03(2)(a), or 28 grams or more of any mixture containing any such substance, but less than 30 kilograms, in violation of Florida Statutes 893.135(l)(c)l.c & 893.135(5), and against the peace and dignity of the State of Florida.
(Emphasis provided).
The trial court concluded that the use of “and/or” charged the purpose of the alleged conspiracy in the “disjunctive conjunction,” such that the charge “does not give a common man the understanding to know what was intended (as the alleged purpose of the purported conspiracy) and, therefore, what is actually charged.” The court held that the charge was required to state “the” object or purpose of the conspiracy rather than “conjunctive or alternative purposes of the conspiracy.” (Emphasis in original).
A review of the charge, however, discloses that the object of the conspiracy alleged was trafficking in oxycodone and that the pertinent statutory provisions were included. In State v. Mena, 471 So.2d 1297, 1300-01 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), we acknowledged that “the allegations of the manner or means by which [a] trafficking offense was to be committed are unnecessary to the adequacy of the conspiracy charge.” The offense of trafficking can be committed by one or more of the several acts delineated in the statute, including sale or delivery. A conspiracy to commit trafficking only requires that the co-conspirators agree to commit the same specified offense, not the same act. Hampton v. State, 135 So.3d 440 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014).
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.140(k)(5) further supports this analysis:
(5) Alternative or Disjunctive Allegations. For an offense that may be committed by doing 1 or more of several acts, or by 1 or more of several means, or with 1 or more of several intents or results, it is permissible to allege in the disjunctive or alternative such acts, means, intents^ or results.
For these reasons, the order of dismissal is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cintron v. U.S. Attorney General, 882 F.3d 1380 (11th Cir. 2018)…in different ways (one by purchasing, the other by selling)." Id. at 443 (emphases added). The Third District Court of Appeal rejected a similar challenge advanced against a conviction for conspiracy to traffic in oxycodone. See State v. Roth , 165 So. 3d 66, 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015) ("The offense of trafficking can be committed by one or more of the several acts delineated in the statute, including sale or delivery. A conspiracy to commit trafficking only requires that the co-conspirators agree…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Carmelo O. Mena, 471 So. 2d 1297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Hampton v. State, 135 So. 3d 440 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)