CATHERINE J. COWART, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JESSE E. COWART, APPELLANT,
v.
SAMROSE HOLDING CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE; CATHERINE J. COWART, APPELLANT, V. SAMROSE HOLDING CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE; WILLIAM STEPHEN WAREING, APPELLANT, V. SAMROSE HOLDING CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
CATHERINE J. COWART, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JESSE E. COWART, APPELLANT,
SAMROSE HOLDING CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE; CATHERINE J. COWART, APPELLANT, V. SAMROSE HOLDING CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE; WILLIAM STEPHEN WAREING, APPELLANT, V. SAMROSE HOLDING CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
109 So. 2d 195
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Brooks v. Peters, 157 Fla. 141, 25 So.2d 205.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shevin v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 333 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1976)…remedy, the granting of the writ is governed by equitable principles. City of Miami Beach v. Jonathan Corp., 238 So. 2d 516, 519 (Fla.App.3d 1970); State ex rel. Davis v. Adams, 283 So. 2d 415, 418 (Fla.1970) (on reh.); State ex rel. Mann v. Burns, 109 So. 2d 195 (Fla.App.1st 1959); State ex rel. Robert L. Turchin, Inc. v. Herin, supra. Just as equitable remedies are unavailable when there is an adequate remedy at law, Egan v. City of Miami, 130 Fla. 465, 178 So. 132 (1938); City of Jacksonville v. Giller, 1…
-
State of Fla. ex rel. Gaines Constr. Co. v. Tillman Pearson, 154 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1963)…w of the second order, because as amended the first order is the same as the second. Inasmuch as review of the first order, as amended, would be useless we should not use the writ of mandamus to compel it. State ex rel. Mann v. Burns, Fla.App.1959, 109 So. 2d 195. We turn then to the second order. We think that the relator is correct in his argument that the second order is ap-pealable because of the provisions of Sec. 57.29, F.S.A. This statute, Sec. 57.29, provides that: “(1) An appeal may be taken fro…
-
State v. Honorable Tom Adams, 238 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 1970)…in which it was held that, even though Relator had a clear legal right for which mandamus was an appropriate remedy, the writ would not be issued when to do so would result in disorder, confusion and disturbance. And in State v. Burns, Fla.App.1959, 109 So. 2d 195, the court further noted that “If issuance of the writ will not promote substantial justice or would lend aid to the effectuation of a probable injustice, the court may properly decline to grant the writ.” Further, as stated in State ex rel. Allen…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Brooks v. Peters, 157 Fla. 141 (Fla. 1946)
- Kinkelaar v. Luella S. Kinkelaar, 157 Fla. 141 (Fla. 1946)