ANTHONY DORSETT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion. Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla.2011); Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). “[R]eview of the record establishes that the defendant did not satisfy the burden of showing entitlement to relief on the face of the record.” Johnson, 60 So.3d at 1051 n. 2. Appellant’s second claim is meritless as the alleged disproportionality between his sentence, and the sentence of his co-defendant, does not establish an “illegal sentence” cognizable under rule 3.800(a). Shivers v. State, 96 So.3d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
Affirmed.
GERBER, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sheffield v. State, 202 So. 3d 439 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
-
Phelps v. State, 243 So. 3d 346 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)
-
Anderson v. State, 270 So. 3d 1291 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011)
- Casteel v. State, 141 So. 3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
- Alphonso Shivers v. State, 96 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
- Ives Renna v. State, 96 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)