FORT MYERS REALTY CO.
v.
SAMUEL E. POOL
FORT MYERS REALTY CO.
SAMUEL E. POOL
113 Fla. 175
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 151 So. 381
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
*176■ Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Lecks, 122 Fla. 127 (Fla. 1935)…ciary and the principles relating to the recovery of unjust penalties announced in Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co., 89 Fla. 224, 104 So. 593 and Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Connell & Schultz, 111 Fla. 572, 149 So. 596, 151 So. 381, do notsupersede the affirmative statutory right of the beneficiary to recover reasonable attorney fees even though payment under the policy was contested in good faith and upon reasonable grounds. The judgment entered in this cause by this court o…
-
Luisa Rodriguez v. Travelers Ins. Co., 367 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…ary, and the principles relating to the recovery of unjust penalties announced in Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co., 89 Fla. 224, 104 So. 593, and Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Connell & Schultz, 111 Fla. 572, 149 So. 596, 151 So. 381, do not supersede the affirmative statutory right of the beneficiary to recover reasonable attorney fees, even though payment under the policy was contested in good faith and upon reasonable grounds.” Accord, e. g., Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. of…