ROHAN MCDONALD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a rule 3.850 motion cannot be summarily denied based solely on a plea form if it does not conclusively refute the defendant's claim of involuntary plea due to counsel's misadvice.
The defendant pleaded guilty based on his attorney's alleged misadvice about the maximum sentence for sexual battery. The postconviction court summari…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Vacate Plea cases and more on FLexlaw
Rohan McDonald appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion. Because the attachment to the order of denial does not conclusively refute his facially sufficient claim, we reverse.
McDonald entered a negotiated plea to five counts, three of which charged him with sexual battery on a victim over twelve years of age. Pursuant to the plea agreement, he was sentenced to ten years for count I, followed by concurrent terms of fifteen years of sex offender probation for each of counts II and III, and to time served for the other two counts.
McDonald filed a rule 3.850 motion arguing his plea was involuntary. He claimed his trial counsel misadvised him that the offense of sexual battery on a victim over twelve was a life felony for which he was facing a possible sentence of life in prison; the offense was a second degree felony. Had he known he could not receive a life sentence for the sexual battery offenses, he alleged, he would not have pleaded but would have insisted on proceeding to trial. He asked to vacate his plea.
The postconviction court summarily denied the motion, attaching only a copy of a plea form containing McDonald’s initials and signature. The form clearly shows the maximum penalty for each charge of sexual battery was fifteen years.
The state properly agrees this case must be remanded because the postconviction court could not rely on the plea form alone, which did not establish that the trial court conducted a proper plea colloquy and determined that McDonald understood the form. Campbell v. State, 139 So.3d 490, 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); see also Townsend v. State, 927 So.2d 1064, 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
If the postconviction court denies the motion again on remand, it must attach portions of the record that refute this ground or conduct an evidentiary hearing.
*1069 Reversed and Remanded for further •proceedings.
MAY, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. State, 207 So. 3d 378 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)…ve in failing to advise her that double jeopardy would preclude her from being convicted of both trafficking in metham-phetamines and manufacturing metham-phetamines were not conclusively refuted by her written plea agreement. See McDonald v. State, 174 So. 3d 1068 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding that postconviction court could not rely on plea form alone; attachment did not establish that trial court conducted proper plea colloquy and determined that appellant understood plea form); Wilkerson v. State, 128 So. 3…
Authorities Cited
- Townsend v. State, 927 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
- Tecoy Marquis Campbell v. State, 139 So. 3d 490 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
- Yachtbrasil Motor Boats & Charters, LLC v. Gluck, 139 So. 3d 490 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)