EMMITT ANTOINE ALEXANDER, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND NIKKITA BENISE HOUSTON, APPELLEES
EMMITT ANTOINE ALEXANDER, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND NIKKITA BENISE HOUSTON, APPELLEES
174 So. 3d 1127
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2015)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Inasmuch as a transcript of the administrative proceeding that resulted in the order on appeal cannot be produced due to a malfunction in the recording equipment, we REVERSE and REMAND for a hearing de novo. See N. Dade Sec. Ltd. v. Dep’t of State, Div. of Licensing, 530 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
ROBERTS, C.J., MARSTILLER and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States Fire Ins. Co. & Oxford Shops of S. Fla. v. Hackett, 260 So. 3d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
-
17 CV 41 Opinion (9th Cir. Ct. App. Div. 2017)
Authorities Cited
- N. Dade Sec. Ltd. Corp. v. Dep't of State, 530 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)