DAVID E. ZIPPERER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2015-10-12
No. 1D14-4105
MARSTILLER, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., concur. .
175 So. 3d 389 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2015) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

David Zipperer appeals an order dismissing his timely pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea to battery on a law enforcement officer. The motion is identical to the one at issue in Zipperer v. State, No. 1D14-4101, 2015 WL 5920180 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 12, 2015), where we affirmed the trial court’s order. For the same reasons, we affirm the order on appeal in this case.

AFFIRMED.

MARSTILLER, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., concur. .

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Newsom v. Newsom, 221 So. 3d 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
    …g and protection from the effects of a final judgment of injunction that lacks any evidentiary support.” Johns v. Johns, 101 So. 3d 377, 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (quoting Achurra v. Achurra, 80 So. 3d 1080, 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)); Parise v. Selph, 175 So. 3d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). Due process requires that each party have a “reasonable opportunity to prove or disprove the allegations made in the complaint.” Id. at 390 (citing Furry v. Rickles, 68 So. 3d 389, 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)). The trial court’s act…
  • Adams v. Cox (Fla. 5th DCA 2025)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw