JUSTIN DORELAS, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION AND FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 2015-10-22
No. 1D14-5305
BENTON, ROWE and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
176 So. 3d 391 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2015)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Justin Dórelas sought restitution from Florida's Homeowners Construction Recovery Fund after paying a contractor for work never performed. The Board approved his claim for only $2,359.53, the amount of a prior restitution order, rather than his requested $33,673.75. The court affirmed, holding that Recovery Fund claims are limited to the amount of an underlying final judgment, award, or restitution order.


Holding

A claimant's Recovery Fund award is limited to the amount of an underlying final judgment, award, or restitution order (or $25,000, whichever is less), or the unsatisfied portion thereof. Because Dórelas had only the Board's $2,359.53 restitution order when he filed his claim, he could recover no more than that amount.


Headnotes

[1] A claimant seeking restitution from the Florida Homeowners Construction Recovery Fund must have obtained a final judgment, arbitration award, or final order from the Boar…

[2] The maximum recovery from the Florida Homeowners Construction Recovery Fund is the lesser of $25,000 or the unsatisfied portion of a claimant's judgment, award, or restit…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“a claimant can recover an amount equal to the judgment, award, or restitution order or $25,000, whichever is less, or an amount equal to the unsatisfied portion of such person's judgment, award, or restitution order, but only to the extent and amount of actual damages suffered by the claimant”

Establishes the statutory ceiling on Recovery Fund awards and the requirement that recovery be limited to actual damages and an underlying enforceable obligation.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Dórelas paid Infinite Construction Group, Inc. for home construction work that was never completed. In earlier disciplinary proceedings, the Board ord…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Justin Dórelas filed a claim for restitution from the Florida Homeowners Construction Recovery Fund (“Recovery Fund”) in the amount of $33,673.75 after paying Infinite Construction Group, Inc., for construction on his home that was never done. The Florida Construction Industry Licensing Board (“Board”), which considers and administers claims from the Recovery Fund, approved the claim for $2,359.33. This figure corresponds to the restitution amount the Board, in earlier license disciplinary proceedings, ordered Infinite Construction to pay Mr. Dórelas for failing to satisfy mechanics’ liens its subcontractors had filed against Mr. Dóre-las’ property. On appeal, Mr. Dórelas argues he is entitled to a greater amount from the Recovery Fund.

The legislature created the Recovery Fund to compensate consumers who suffer monetary damages as a result of certain violations by licensed contractors. See § 489.1401, Fla. Stat. (2010). Certain conditions must be met for a claimant to obtain restitution from the Recovery Fund. One such condition is the claimant must have obtained a final judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction, an arbitration award, or a final order from the Board directing the licensee to pay restitution to the claimant. § 489.141(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2010). Assuming all conditions are met, a claimant can recover

*392an amount ; equal to the judgment, award, or restitution order or $25,000, whichever is less, or an amount equal to the unsatisfied portion of such person’s judgment, award, or restitution order, but only to the extent and amount of actual damages suffered by the claimant.

§ 489.143(2), Fla. Stat. (2010) (emphasis added). When Mr. Dórelas filed his claim for relief from the Recovery Fund, he had only the Board’s final order directing Infinite Construction' to pay him $2,359.53. Consequently, the Board could only award Mr, Dórelas that amount.

■ We note an apparent scrivener’s error in the order on appeal, however. It reflects a recovery amount of $2,359.33, while the restitution amount the Board ordered Infinite Construction to pay. is. $2,359.53. We therefore modify the order on appeal to reflect approval of Mr. Dórelas’ claim from the, Recovery Fund in the amount of $2,359.53, and affirm the order as modified.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

BENTON, ROWE and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw