BEVERLY RANKINE, APPELLANT,
v.
AMR CORPORATION AND SEDGWICK CLAIM MANAGEMENT SERVICES, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 2015-10-22
No. 1D15-2892
BENTON, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
176 So. 3d 392 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2015) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIÁM.

PER CURIÁM.

Based on Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 124 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Castellanos. Id. at 394. See Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 421 n. * (Fla.1981).

BENTON, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 192 So. 3d 431 (Fla. 2016)
    …and Commercial Risk Management, 184 So. 3d 665 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016); Perez v. Univision Network LP/Sentry Claims Service, 184 So. 3d 653 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016); Weimar v. L’Oreal USA S/D, Inc., 176 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Rankine v. AMR Corp., 176 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Zaldivar v. Prieto, 174 So. 3d 1126 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Gallagher Law Grp., P.A. v. Vic Renovations, 174 So,3d 1124 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Zaldivar v. Dyke Indus., Inc., 168 So. 3d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Ferrer v. Truly Nolen o…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw