FRANK OWENS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2015-10-13
No. 5D15-1968
ORFINGER, TORPY and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
177 So. 3d 1277 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2015) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Valentin v. State, 963 So.2d 317 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

ORFINGER, TORPY and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Statsick, 231 So. 3d 528 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
    …. 1982). . Even if the record supported the factual finding that there was no meeting of the minds, we would reject the argument that there had been a mistake remediable under rule 1.540(b)(1). See Eagle FL VI SPE, LLC v. T & A Family P’ship, Ltd., 177 So. 3d 1277, 1280 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ("Nor does [rule 1.540(b)(1) ] allow a party to avoid the consequences of a decision to settle litigation even if the party regards the settlement as 'bad' in retrospect.” (quoting Smiles v. Young, 271 So. 2d 798, 802-03 (Fl…
  • Hilton M. Wiener v. The Country Club of Woodfield, Inc., 254 So. 3d 488 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
  • Landmark Am. Ins. Co. v. Pin-Pon Corp., 267 So. 3d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw