DAVIS YVES NICOLAS, APPELLANT,

v.

MINOUCHE BLANC, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2015-09-30

No. 3D14-2331

Per Curiam

178 So. 3d 430 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2015)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Florida appellate court affirmed trial court's order granting mother's petition to relocate with child to Georgia, finding competent and substantial evidence supported the relocation decision under section 61.13001(7).

Holding

The trial court properly applied the statutory relocation factors under section 61.13001(7), Florida Statutes, and its order granting mother's relocation petition was supported by competent and substantial evidence.

Headnotes

[1] A trial court's relocation order is affirmed when it properly applies the statutory factors under section 61.13001(7), Florida Statutes, and articulates findings of fact…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Father appealed a final order granting mother's petition to relocate with their child to Georgia. Father contended the trial court lacked competent an…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Topics

Petition To Relocate Child Relocation Best Interests Of The Child Competent Substantial Evidence

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition To Relocate cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Davis Yves Nicolas (“Father”), appeals a final order granting the petition of Appellee, Minouehe Blanc-(“Mother”), to relocate to Georgia. Father contends that there was no competent and substantial evidence to support the court’s final order. Having reviewed the trial court’s thorough order, and the record evidence upon which it was based, we find that the trial court properly considered and applied the requisite and applicable factors set forth in section 61.13001(7), Florida Statutes (2014), and articulated findings of fact which were supported by the competent substantial evidence presented. We, affirm the trial court’s order granting relocation.1 .

. Father raises two additional issues, each of which we find to be without merit, and only one of which warrants any further discussion.' Father asserts that, on '{he day of the final hearing, Mother provided Father with a copy of a letter from her. prospective employer in Georgia. Before the hearing began, Father moved to exclude the letter as' a potential exhibit, given that Mother provided it to Father immediately before the hearing. The trial court denied the motion to exclude, but indicated it would hear further objections if and when Mother sought to introduce the letter during the hearing. The record establishes that Mother never sought to introduce the letter into evidence and there is nothing in the record to suggest the letter was considered by the trial Court. Any asserted error resulting from the court’s pretrial ruling was therefore harmless.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

DAVIS YVES NICOLAS, APPELLANT, v. MINOUCHE BLANC, APPELLEE

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

DAVIS YVES NICOLAS, APPELLANT,

v.

MINOUCHE BLANC, APPELLEE