JAY LAKE, APPELLANT,
v.
CANDACE LAKE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court affirmed the non-final order because the husband failed to preserve any errors for appeal.
The husband appealed a non-final order awarding temporary support, attorney's fees, and costs in a pending dissolution of marriage case. The wife's fo…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Temporary Support cases and more on FLexlaw
In a pending dissolution of marriage case, the husband appeals a non-final order on the wife’s motion for temporary support/alimony, attorney’s fees, costs, and suit monies.1 Although the order on appeal raises certain questions,2 the husband *178failed to preserve any errors for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm, but without prejudice to the husband’s challenging the fees at the time of the final judgment. See Ghay v. Ghay, 954 So.2d 1186, 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (recognizing that temporary support orders do not create vested rights, can be modified, and inequities in them can be resolved in the final judgment).
Affirmed without prejudice to challenging temporary fees at the time of final judgment.
WARNER, STEVENSON and CONNER, JJ., concur.