JAMES D. WELCH, APPELLANT,

v.

THE FLORIDA BAR, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hunt v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 327 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 1976)
  …eir employment under the doctrine of admissions. Myrick v. Lloyd, 158 Fla. 47, 27 So. 2d 615 (1946); Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Rosenquist, 112 So. 2d 885 (2d D.C.A.Fla. 1959); Gordon v. Hotel Seville, 105 So. 2d 175 (3d D.C.A.Fla. 1958), cert. denied 109 So. 2d 767 (Fla.1959). It is important to note that such statements are admissible because they are the admissions of a party-opponent or adverse party and not because they are declarations against interest. The differences between these two well-recognized ex…
• Castaneda v. Redlands Christian Migrant Ass'n, Inc., 884 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
  …ir employment and were made while the deponents were still employees of Redlands. Similarly, as noted in the Law Revision Council Note to section 90.803: In Gordon v. Hotel Seville, Inc., 105 So. 2d 175, 177 (Fla.3rd Dist.1958), certiorari denied, 109 So. 2d 767 (Fla.1959) the court stated: An admission against interest made by an employee in the course of and within the scope of his employment and relating to a matter which is not beyond the penumbra of his duties or employment, is a recognized exception…
• THE Florida BAR v. Welch, 309 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 1975)
  …Respondent has a prior disciplinary history. He had been disbarred in April, 1965, for misappropriation of clients’ funds —the same offense of which he presently stands charged. The disbarment was approved by this Court in Welch v. The Florida Bar, 109 So. 2d 767 (Fla.1959).1 He was subsequently reinstated2 but was later publicly reprimanded by this Court and placed on three years probation in 1972. The Florida Bar v. Welch, 272 So. 2d 139 (Fla.1972). We there found, based in part on respondent’s own testimo…