JODY LOUIS, APPELLANT,
v.
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A university's final decision imposing disciplinary sanctions against a student is reviewable by certiorari in the circuit court, not directly appealable to the district court of appeal.
A university student was sanctioned for violating the student code of conduct and appealed the decision to the district court of appeal. The student a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Student Disciplinary Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE FOR CERTIORARI REVIEW IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR HILLS-BOROUGH COUNTY
Jody Louis, a student at the University of South Florida (USF), appeals a final decision from USF imposing disciplinary sanctions against him for the violation of USF’s Student Code of Conduct. On appeal, he argues that his due process rights were violated at the formal disciplinary hearing for several reasons, including that all of the evidence introduced by USF was hearsay.
USF correctly argues that USF’s final decision is not appealable to this court. Rather, it is reviewable by certiorari in the appropriate circuit court because in making a final determination regarding disciplinary proceedings against a student, the university was acting pursuant to its authority under article IX, section 7(d) of the Florida Constitution and not as an “agency” as defined by the Administrative Procedure Act. See Rivera v. Univ. of S. Fla. St. Petersburg, 176 So.3d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Decker v. Univ. of W. Fla., 85 So.3d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). In fairness to Mr. Louis, the final decision from the Assistant Vice President and Dean of Students at USF informed Mr. Louis that he had “the right to appeal” the decision to this court.
We transfer this case to the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Hillsborough County for treatment as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(b)(1). Following transfer, the circuit court can decide whether the briefing in this case is sufficient to facilitate certiorari review or whether it is necessary for the circuit court to order the filing of a proper petition and response.
VILLANTI, C.J., and LUCAS, J., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shed v. Univ. of S. Fla. Bd. of Trs. (M.D. Fla. 2023)
Authorities Cited
- Decker v. Univ. OF W. Fla., 85 So. 3d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
- Carlton Lucius Goodson v. State, 85 So. 3d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
- Rivera v. Univ. of S. Fla. ST. Petersburg, 176 So. 3d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)