MICHAEL GOLDBERG, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2016-01-06
No. 4D14-3426
TAYLOR, CONNER and . KLINGEÑSMITH, JJ., concur.
182 So. 3d 847 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2016)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Michael Goldberg appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. The court reverses and remands as to his claim that counsel failed to convey a plea offer, but affirms the denial of his six remaining ineffective assistance claims.


Holding

The court held that Goldberg's claim was facially sufficient under the Cottle standard applicable at the time the motion was filed, and therefore the trial court erred in summarily denying it. The court reversed and remanded for further proceedings on this claim, though the law may have changed after the motion was filed.


Headnotes

[1] A defendant's claim that counsel failed to convey a plea offer is facially sufficient if the defendant alleges counsel failed to convey the offer, that the defendant woul…

[2] A defendant seeking post-conviction relief for counsel's failure to convey a plea offer must allege that the prosecutor would not have withdrawn the offer and the court w…

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Goldberg's claim is facially sufficient under Cottle and is not conclusively refuted by the record, the trial court erred in summarily denying it.”

Establishes the standard for facial sufficiency of ineffective assistance claims and why summary denial was improper.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Following a jury trial, Goldberg was convicted of two counts of battery on a law enforcement officer and aggravated fleeing and elueling. He received …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Goldberg appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he alleged seven claims -of ineffective assistance of counsel. We reverse and remand for further .proceedings as to Goldberg’s claim that cojm-sel failed to convey a plea offer. We affirm the denial of Goldberg’s remaining elaims without comment.

Following a jury trial, Goldberg was convicted of two counts of battery on a law enforcement officer and aggravated fleeing and eluding. The trial court imposed two terms of ten years in prison as to the battery charges and one term of thirty years in prison as to the aggravated fleeing and eluding, all habitual felony offender sentences, to run concurrently.

Goldberg alleges that counsel failed to inform him of a plea offer of fifteen years in prison. He claims that if he had been *848properly informed, he would have accepted the plea and would not have gone to trial. Acceptance of this offer would have resulted in a lesser sentence than the thirty years in prison he is currently serving.

Under the law in effect at the time his motion was filed, Goldberg’s claim is facially sufficient. Cottle v. State, 733 So.2d 963 (Fla.1999), required a defendant to allege only that (1) coun'sel failed to convey a plea offer; (2) he would have accepted the. plea offer but for counsel’s failure to convey it; and (3) acceptance of the plea would have resulted ,in a lesser sentence than was ultimately imposed. See id. at 967.

Because Goldberg’s claim .is facially sufficient under Cottle and is not conclusively refuted by the record, the trial court erred in summarily denying it. After Goldberg’s motion was filed, the Florida Supreme Court decided Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419 (Fla.2013), in which it receded from Cottle and held that a defendant must also allege that the prosecutor would not have withdrawn the plea offer and the court would have accepted it. See Alcorn, 121 So.3d at 429-30. Accordingly,’ we reverse and remand for further proceedings as to Goldberg’s claim that counsel failed to convey a plea offer of fifteen years in prison.

. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. , .

TAYLOR, CONNER and . KLINGEÑSMITH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw