PERCIVAL CHARLES FERRIS, JR., PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., RESPONDENT
PERCIVAL CHARLES FERRIS, JR., PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., RESPONDENT
183 So. 3d 1070
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2015)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).
Petitioner is warned that any future filings which the court determines to be successive or frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a bar to further pro se filings and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections as provided in *1071section 944.279, Florida Statutes. See Fla.R. App. P. 9.410.
WOLF, THOMAS, and OSTERHAUS,. JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shotwell v. State, 208 So. 3d 1192 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)…conceded error and asked this Court to modify the trial court’s decision by affirming the denial of the 3.801 motion to specify that it was without prejudice to Shotwell refiling an amended motion within 60 days. Subsequently, in Shotwell v. State, 183 So. 3d 1070, 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015), this Court affirmed without prejudice to Shot-well filing “an amended, legally sufficient 3.801 petition within sixty (60) days” of the date of the issuance of that opinion — May 6, 2015. Six days later, on May 12, 2015, Sh…
Authorities Cited
- Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004)